Recently, I finally reached the end of the hefty Black Wings, â€œTwenty-One Tales of Lovecraftian Horrorâ€ edited by S.T. Joshi. I picked it up a while ago in a burst of enthusiasm after it was discussed on the HP Lovecraft Literary Podcast, but hadnâ€™t got round to finishing it. Last year was dedicated to a focused reading project, in an attempt to cut down my unread book pile to something that couldnâ€™t be described as â€œcyclopeanâ€ and leave me with a library that more-or-less fit in my room. Despite some hefty health-based setbacks, I was pretty successful â€“ I read eight feet of books â€“ but had left out Black Wings on account of it being huge â€“ and also on the grounds that a) I had a lot of short story collections to get through, and b] I donâ€™t find short story anthologies especially well-suited to rapid reading, as I like to digest each one. But its time eventually came this year, when I felt a bit more relaxed about my reading.
I think the main impression I came away with was that itâ€™s a collection varied enough that itâ€™s drifting into patchwork territory. Iâ€™ll happily accept that thereâ€™s a wide variety of tastes in weird stories, and these offer a broad selection of them; at the same time, I have to say that Joshiâ€™s and my definitions of â€œLovecraftianâ€ obviously diverge considerably. Thatâ€™s true not only in the general sweep of the collection, but also in some brow-crinkling specifics.
For full disclosure, I think this is actually the first specifically non-Lovecraft Lovecraftian thing Iâ€™ve read; as such Iâ€™m not at all in touch with how things may be done or understood in that subgenre. I may well be the outlier here.
Generally speaking, I tend to assume that anything labelled Author+ian will be similar along several axes: the general tone of the stories; the themes and tropes of plot and character; the writing style; and to some extent, the broad structure of the story. A hardboiled Glaswegian detective story about grey morality and the shared misery of humanity doesnâ€™t become Wodehousian by adding a few purple flourishes and a stolen pig. I donâ€™t say that something needs to be a complete pastiche to deserve the moniker, but I expect a fair amount of similarity.
Joshi here takes a much broader view, and offers a selection of stories that take in pastiche, some slightly humorous takes, tales with a more philosophical or artistic bent, stories building (and depending) on existing Lovecraft stories, stories playing with the same themes, and everything in between. He also includes some stories whose connection to the ostensible theme can only be described as â€œtenuousâ€. Some of those categories impressed me more than others; your mileage may vary.
Iâ€™m not aiming to give detailed reviews of each story, because that would get very long, and also because Iâ€™ve given my copy away. Instead, Iâ€™ve grouped them into rough categories with shared features that I can discuss easily. Nevertheless, mini-reviews sort of arise organically here, and spoilers will abound. A list of stories and authors is given at the end.
Obviously, this is all personal opinion and taste. Feel free to differ, and do please tell me why in the comments.
Several of the stories can, I think, be reasonably considered as pastiches. Iâ€™m not using this in a derogatory sense; what I mean is, these stories seem to be aiming to match Lovecraftâ€™s writing at multiple points, rather than to take things distinctly in their own direction. The stories Iâ€™d tend to class here are Desert Dreams, The Dome, Usurped, and Howling in the Dark
In passing, I note that the first three of these (as well as Engraving, of which more later) are essentially set in the desert. Perhaps the emptiness and wildness of deserts, and their remoteness from comfortable and human-filled urban life, makes them a good candidate for weird stories. Lovecraft wrote quite a number of stories set in the wilderness, and otherwise had a fondness (in his stories, at least) for remote and lonely places.
I found all of these stories reasonable. Desert Dreams worked much better for me than Usurped, despite being quite similar in their premise of a lone man lured out into the desert to discover something terrible. Desert Dreams was actually oddly reminiscent of The Shadow out of Time for me. It was similar enough to Lovecraftâ€™s style that I actually tripped up on the pacing, because I was expecting a slow revelatory middle section with research or contemplation that would foreshadow the ending; in fact, the story was shorter than Iâ€™d realised and what I took to be the middle was the beginning of the end, with the truth of matters not announced halfway through, as Lovecraft did things, but revealed in the climax. Usurped felt a little too disconnected to me, with the original strange events not particularly connected to the climax in any way I understood.
The Dome wasnâ€™t obviously drawing from any story I can think of, but felt like it fitted well; it eschewed the generic Lovecraftian voice for one more suited to its narrator, which I found made for a simple and almost humble story, without the portentousness most tend to have. Itâ€™s almost an inverted Music of Erich Zann, and does rely on two coincidences of timing for the narrator to first discover and then (accidentally) foil the summoning of elder gods. In fairness, though, most stories rely on some amount of coincidence â€“ the point being that these are stories of the rare people who do stumble into interesting events â€“ and it wasnâ€™t a problem for me. In contrast, Howling in the Dark could be compared to Hypnos, Azathoth or The Book in its portrayal of longing (in this case, for peaceful darkness) and immersion in an inner world, without drawing directly on any of them. I actually found it a striking portrayal of the adolescent mind, or at least my vague memories of it â€“ the sense of being distant from those around you, because whatâ€™s important to you is so different.
The Pickman Mythos
Two of the stories are based on Pickmanâ€™s Model. Actually, thatâ€™s not quite accurate; better said, two of the stories are actually sequels to Pickmanâ€™s Model and will be more or less incomprehensible to anyone who hasnâ€™t read that. It isnâ€™t a particular flaw, because most readers will have previously read Lovecraft, but it is worth noting that I donâ€™t think they contain enough backstory to compensate for anyone who hasnâ€™t. I also feel like they require you to have some investment in Pickmanâ€™s Model to be effective, so theyâ€™d struggle even with an infodump.
Anyway, these stories are (unsurprisingly) Pickman's Other Model, and The Truth about Pickman. Despite the shared source, and the fact that both follow the theme of heredity and being oneself, theyâ€™re very different in approach.
The first is essentially a series of odd vignettes, with recognisable Lovecraftian elements to them, which build up into a ghoul-themed story â€“ although not one which quite fits with ghouls as presented by Lovecraft, it must be said. I found it rather hollow and too artsy for my taste; I felt like I had to work hard for not that much payoff. In one sense there is a bigger story behind it, of family and betrayal, which you can extrapolate to some extent; however, it didnâ€™t really do much for me. I felt like it was lacking the sense of a substantial and articulated bigger picture, of what was really going on overall.
In contrast, Truth is very clear about what is going on, and takes this to the extent of explaining away quite a lot of Pickmanâ€™s Model along the way. It has a distinctly English feel to it somehow, which I enjoyed, and I found its premise â€“ mixing heredity, science and superstition â€“ to be quite interesting. The ghoul transformation is explained away as a genetic flaw activated by chemicals found in certain water sources, a creative idea, although again, one which rather contradicts Pickmanâ€™s Model. On the downside, while with one hand it relieves the darkness of Pickmanâ€™s Model, it doesnâ€™t really have compensating darkness of its own, while left me a bit disappointed â€“ you could almost call it an un-Weird Tale. The predictable final twist seems to be aiming for a Saki-like savage humour, but the presentation was bland and calm enough that it didnâ€™t really sink in for a while, and just didnâ€™t seem to have enough bite.
A few of the stories had a fairly stripped-down and lighter take on the Mythos. These were Substitution, An Eldritch Matter, and Engraving. Only the last seemed to aim for horror, and all three diverged considerably from Lovecraftâ€™s writings in style, content and subject matter. With no real recognisably Mythos content, they could really have been slotted into any weird story anthology without a blink, or indeed into quite a lot of generic short story anthologies â€“ which isnâ€™t a criticism, just an observation.
Of these, one pulls it off pleasantly, one sort of dissipated, and the third flattened itself against a window like the berry-drunk pigeons of my childhood home enlivening GCSE revision. In this analogy, I am presumably the sparrowhawk that took to hanging about in our street, lazily flapping over into suburban gardens, and plucking and devouring the unwise tipplers where they fell.
Like The Dome, Substitution has a voice much distinct from the traditional Lovecraft portentousness. I found it quite clunky to begin with; itâ€™s not particularly elegant, but quite long-winded. After a while, though, I found it quite fitting to the narrator, who is middle-class enough to bounce couscous off. The story builds quite slowly, is fairly low key, and quietly entertaining. His attempts to delve into the mystery are the kind of stumbling efforts that might feature in a Hugh Grant film, or my own life. A twist ending is inevitable, but I didnâ€™t guess quite the shape it would take, expecting something rather darker.
An Eldritch Matter also seems to aim for the mildly-humorous niche, but I didnâ€™t feel it worked. The premise, of a man picking up a strange artefact that mutates him, was perfectly fine, and there was a well-depicted scene of the actual mutation in his office, with panicking colleagues all around. The problem was that the ending didnâ€™t feel like a cap on events, not quite managing to be an ironic finish nor a twist ending. Essentially, a doctor extracts the artefact from the victimâ€™s swollen torso â€“ and is mutated in turn. Humour is really hard to dissect, but... I think I needed more surprise? I already knew the artefact mutates people. So if, perhaps, it seemed that theyâ€™d fixed things, but then it went wrong again, that might be funny. From a broader story point of view, this shares an issue with Pickmanâ€™s Other Model in that I felt like it lacked a broader context that would have given it more heft; unlike POM, the problem here was that it didnâ€™t feel like a standalone story at all, but very much like the exerpt from forthcoming works youâ€™ll find in the DVD Extras section at the back of many books nowadays. This is one of the few stories that I feel I can objectively criticise; it just doesnâ€™t seem to do the job of a short story properly, which is a shame, as I generally enjoyed what was there.
And then we have Engraving. Ah, Engraving. This not-unpromising four-page vignette is a workmanlike piece of occult horror, hindered only by being padded out to ten pages with a profanity-laden diatribe on precipitation apparently recycled from a crime show script that didnâ€™t impress the studios. Iâ€™m about 90% sure this one is intended to be ironic, with a bargain not working out as the narrator intended, as he discovers heâ€™s a kind of Whateley child, begotten of an extradimensional father to be a sacrifice that would allow them entry to our world. Its Lovecraftianness came across largely through terminology, and I didnâ€™t feel there was anything especially Lovecraft-like about it at heart; in many ways it seemed more suited to a semi-Catholic occult tradition.
A substantial number of the stories felt like genuine successor works, with strong affiliations to Lovecraftâ€™s writing, but putting their own distinctive spin on things. For the most part I liked these. They generally avoided trying for a Lovecraft voice, but had similarly rich description; however, protagonistsâ€™ voices came through distinctly and to good effect.
Both Tempting Providence and Tunnels borrow existing monsters to spin new stories, in both cases with reasonable but mixed success. I found them good at creating atmosphere that made the creatures feel threatening, which can be a challenge. On the downside, both were a bit wordy. Tempting Providence spins a word-picture of Providence that would mean a lot more to someone whoâ€™d visited or was invested in Lovecraftâ€™s life, which makes for a rather long early section where nothing much seems to happen. In retrospect, it contains some early hints and makes for a slow-build story, but I came close to skipping ahead; Iâ€™m glad I didnâ€™t. Tunnels has the opposite problem, being initially quite concise and evocative, but turning infodumpy when secrets begin to unravel. It does have a nice premise though, taking the unusual decision to focus on survivors of a previous Mythos event, and how it continues to haunt them.
Like Substitution, Tempting Providence had some depictions of psychology that I found quite effective in the way our protagonist responds to events, and fights the enemyâ€™s lures. When things kick off in earnest, it brings a fresh eye to an old monster. This story tries a similar trick to The Truth about Pickman, but pulls it off far more convincingly: a new take on the monster lets you reconsider The Haunter of the Dark, but doesnâ€™t undermine the original story, and I donâ€™t think having never heard of it would pose you much of a problem either.
The Broadsword is the longest of the stories, effectively a novella, and the weirdest one that I really claim to have followed or cared about. Itâ€™s never entirely clear what happened, but the general strokes are clear; thereâ€™s a process of degeneration, madness and change that evoked a strange mixture of The Rats in the Walls and The Shadow over Innsmouth. This contrasts in just about every particular with Lesser Demons, a pulpy zombie apocalypse story about shooting monsters with shotguns, whose protagonist is so pragmatic and unrattled about it all that he felt rather like an FPS protagonist â€“ I wonder whether this was a deliberate artistic decision, to illustrate a sort of emotional blunting that is itself verging on madness, essentially PTSD. Despite the description I just gave, thereâ€™s a Lovecraftian core to it, of tomes and the unlocking of terrible things from beyond. Both were very enjoyable.
Violence, Child of Trust takes the very promising tack of examining a cult from within, only to squander it. One of my pet hates in fiction is the artistic Mysterious Conversation, where characters perfectly aware of the details of their discussion and talking in absolute privacy nevertheless remain coy and evasive, in order to bludgeon the reader over the head with the point that an Important Mysterious Conversation is taking place, without having to give away (or, indeed, think up) any interesting or relevant content.
Violence goes one better by having inner monologues done this way. Now, in fairness, perhaps inner monologues are a little vague, but at the same time the monologuer knows exactly what theyâ€™re referring to â€“ when I am in someoneâ€™s head, I should know too. This exasperating coyness makes the plot frankly a pain to wade through, while revealing essentially nothing about the cult, their activities, or why they stick around in this miserable hole kidnapping and sacrificing people instead of chucking it in for a peaceful life. It has a twist ending, which I only realised the following day after a niggling sentence led me to painstakingly reread several pages â€“ I find that telling.
The cream of the crop, though, was Copping Squid, a story that I canâ€™t imagine Lovecraft writing any part of, but which nevertheless managed to feel steeped in Lovecraftiana. If I had to hold up one story and say â€œthis, this was what I expectedâ€, Copping Squid is it. Characters, language and events are entirely modern, but though the details differ, the flavour percolates through. As in several of Lovecraftâ€™s stories, a chance acquaintance with secret knowledge is key to the story; this one really managed to sell me on the mad charisma of its initiate, who seemed to exude a kind of presence that I could absolutely believe in as something that dragged others along in its wake. In fact, I found him a bit akin to the friend in Hypnos. It was reminiscent of things like The Shunned House, but there seemed to be a sense of fate in it that someone more cultured could probably link to things like Greek theatre, the works of Shakespeare or obscure French philosophers. Or maybe I imagined it.
Is This The Real Life? Is This Just Fantasy?
Three of the stories seemed to be playing with ideas about reality: Passing Spirits, Susie, and The Inhabitants of Wraithwood.
Passing Spirits was a strange fish, and one of the stories whose inclusion I have to question strongly. That being said, Iâ€™m not sure where else other than this collection you could possibly publish it. The premise has a terminally-ill protagonist hallucinating Lovecraft and his creations. It has a Mythos-per-page density that rivals the H. P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia, but at the same time, I feel like it has about the same claim to be a Mythos tale. It seems deeply uncertain about what kind of story it is: initially it looks like a time-travel story, then a Blithe Spirits homage, but then it ends up as sort of rambling name-dropping exercise that I found tedious. Though in some senses itâ€™s playing with reality, at the same time, the narrator is entirely and perfectly aware of the hallucinationsâ€™ imaginary nature. With no mystery, no supernatural mystery, and nothing of Lovecraft about its style, themes or mood, it departs so far from the ostensible premise of the collection that I donâ€™t really know what to do with or think about it.
Wraithwood is a much more traditional story in some ways, with a (prison? rehab?) escapee stumbling into a peculiar house that seems to offer shelter, but hides a dreadful secret. Itâ€™s not very secret, in fairness, because you can spot it on about the third page â€“ one of the storyâ€™s better claims to Lovecraftian influence. This storyâ€™s theme seems to be a blurring of the lines between reality and art, as denizens of the house are transformed into scenes from Pickman-esque grotesque art that hangs around the house, an intriguing and potentially powerful idea. Unfortunately, the story felt unstructured and unfocused to me. The narrator stumbles from one peculiar vignette or conversation to another, reacting unconvincingly and constantly taking mind-altering drugs, a combination which leaves a vaguely portentous atmosphere but conveys very little substance.
The collectionâ€™s sole definitely-female protagonist appears in Susie, in the shape of a dying cultist. Much like Passing Spirits in some ways, it has a genuine Mythos connection, but an even more unreliable protagonist. Itâ€™s accompanied by a writing style that would be considered obscurantist and perverse by a writer of horoscopes for Mensa International, laden with sentences so autoparodic they embody all that mockers of the arts so despise. Nothing is merely said that could possibly be averred, and when you see a sentence like "Surcease is a formula etched on the aethers, magically descriptive, nebular, galactic in implication," itâ€™s nigh-impossible to take the story seriously.
That isn't a problem. The problem is, I can't tell whether it's meant to be taken seriously, and I sort of suspect that it is.
From the scraps of story I could discern, I think this is an homage to The Dunwich Horror, and potentially quite a decent one. Of the three stories in this group, this is the one which most successfully blurs the boundaries of reality and madness. Unfortunately, I donâ€™t think blending that approach with an opaque writing style was a good move, because the combination makes story and writing alike very hard to appreciate. If it's supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek stylistic parody, good job on the parodying, but it still leaves a story that's considerably harder to read than the originals, so that doesn't quite work either. Sorry. I'd like to have liked it.
Approaching the end now, we find two stories that take quite experimental approaches and produce rather different kinds of story. Denker's Book is a gradual explanation of events leading up to a past Mythos disaster, with the Necromonicon used as a kind of power source. The Correspondence of Cameron Thaddeus Nash is a set of letters sent to Lovecraft. Both are promising premises with an interesting core, but neither one worked out well for me.
I think the problem with epistolary writing is that itâ€™s really very difficult to craft a set of convincing letters that simultaneously reveal an ongoing story. In this case, the letters are trying to convey the authorâ€™s progression of feelings towards Lovecraft, his mental degradation, and also a Mythos mystery, which is a lot. It takes a lot of letters to reveal a relatively simple story, and sadly the letters themselves are unlikely to be that interesting unless youâ€™re a fan of Lovecraft Circle correspondence, as itâ€™s mostly a set of diatribes against various authors. For someone whoâ€™s read Lovecraftâ€™s letters and knows the work and personalities of all his mates, as well as the sort of letters fans might write, I suspect itâ€™s a lot more fun. This was a significant drawback, because not being particularly interested in the bulk of the writing, I had to concentrate to follow the story.
Similarly, the piecemeal revelations of Denkerâ€™s Book mean a very simple story is told at considerable length, although to be fair itâ€™s the shortest story in the bunch. Because it seems to be saving the revelation, thereâ€™s a lot of beating around the bush and a fragmented approach to the story, skipping around between points. I found the style quite hard to plough through to extract these motes of meaning, and the payoff for putting them together didn't nearly feel like it justified the effort.
I sort of feel like this one deserves its own section, because I donâ€™t really feel like anything else deserves to share a section with Rotterdam â€“ not even Passing Spirits. Remember that bit where I talked about â€œtenuous connectionsâ€? This, right here, is it.
Lookâ€¦ Iâ€™m prepared to accept that my ideas about what is and is not Lovecraftian may not align with the majority view, but this story appears to be included solely and wholly on the strength of using the word â€œLovecraftâ€.
A bitter man does location scouting in Rotterdam, hoping to win the contract to work on an adaptation of Lovecraftâ€™s The Hound. There are sporadic and tentative suggestions that some shenanigans may ensue involving the work of Anthony Gormley, whose metal figures seem to be following the narrator, but despite piquing my interest (Gormleys live on a beach near my hometown) it doesnâ€™t go anywhere. After much aimless wandering through blandly-depressing bits of town, self-pity and drinking, the narrator discovers and conceals a brutal murder that he might have committed or something but honestly it's hard to know, or indeed care. There doesn't seem to be any rhythm, or narrative progression, or anything much.
I try to be reasonably restrained in my criticism, butâ€¦ what this most felt like to me is the kind of writing exercise they set us for GCSE English â€“ disparate and unfulfilled ideas, floating in a sea of words that produce some kind of atmosphere but ultimately end in an arbitrary non-climax. Ending an English assignment with a random murder out of nowhere is exactly the kind of thing my classmates did.
But even aside from that, even assuming my artistic judgment is completely and utterly wrong and this is a work of unabashed genius - it has no place here. Stick it in a collection of general fiction, or literary fiction, where it may be appreciated. I genuinely do not understand what on earth ST Joshi was thinking. He must have had reasons. I cannot conceive of them.
Taken as a whole, I found this a middling anthology; I think most readers would find plenty to interest them (even non-fans of weird tales might enjoy Substitution) but few are going to enjoy all of these disparate stories. I can't recommend immediately rushing out to buy it, but I certainly don't suggest avoiding it.
Considering itâ€™s a Lovecraftian collection, it shouldnâ€™t be a surprise that there werenâ€™t more female characters. Women serve mostly as plot points, although in Wraithwood and Pickmanâ€™s Other Model they have dialogue and come to life a little more. On the plus side, the stories offer characters from a selection of backgrounds, not just the educated professionals that tend to populate Lovecraft's work.
Compulsion is a theme in several of the books, and is portrayed with varying degrees of success. Usurped didnâ€™t quite manage to sell the inevitability of its protagonistâ€™s doom, trapped by supernatural bait, which left it feeling a little flat compared to Desert Dreams. Iâ€™ll cheerfully admit that mysterious dreams are a clichÃ©, perhaps more in the Call of Cthulhu RPG than in fiction, but I found Desert Dreams well-executed and without anything that made me go â€œwait, hang onâ€. Substitution did well here, offering a portrayal of a completely mundane, embarrassed, probably-innocent obsession that I found strangely believable, while also creepy â€“ definitely something you wouldnâ€™t want to admit. A supernatural compulsion holds the protagonist of Wraithwood in place, at least in theory, but given the gothic grotesqueness and obvious menace of his surroundings, I mostly got the impression that he stayed put through a lack of initiative or common sense.
Ahem. Those of you weighing my verdicts may, at this point, find it helpful to know that I spent most of Wuthering Heights being exasperated at how irrationally everyone behaved...
Both Rotterdam and The Inhabitants of Wraithwood fall prey to a common delusion, that taking drugs (whether thatâ€™s illicit substances or just alcohol) and the recounted experience of intoxication are intrinsically interesting. As anyone whoâ€™s been the only sober head in a room of drinkers can attest, this is not the case, any more in fiction than in reality, and the weight given to those elements simply added tedium to these tales.
Several stories seemed unable to settle on a genre, and ended up feeling like nothing in particular. Wraithwood seemed unable to decide whether it was an atmospheric horror novel (in which case, too many disparate vignettes were crammed together for the atmosphere to really build) or a creepy story (in which case there was too much extraneous portentous wafflage). As in Pickmanâ€™s Other Model, the story seemed reluctant to go beyond superficial revelations to any kind of deeper mystery, which left it feeling shallow. Rotterdam takes this to a further extreme: It could have been a mystery, weird tale, horror or crime story, but doesnâ€™t seem to make a particular stab at any of them. Thereâ€™s nothing mysterious enough to be a mystery, nothing weird enough to be a weird tale. The murder is brutal but bland, and is dealt with in an offhand way that doesnâ€™t allow it to become a focus, as a thriller would require â€“ itâ€™s also right at the end of the story, with no room to breathe.
While Iâ€™ve been pretty critical (always the easy bit), I found a lot of the stories very enjoyable and creative. Several authors did a great job of Mythos stories with a more modern feel and a less tortuous style than the originals.
I would recommend Copping Squid, Tempting Providence, Desert Dreams, The Broadsword, The Dome, Tunnels, Howling in the Dark, Usurped, Substitution and Lesser Demons. That's nearly 50% of the collection.
The Truth about Pickman is worth a look if you enjoyed Pickmanâ€™s Model but will be baffling otherwise.
If youâ€™ve a taste for literary fiction, you might find Pickman's Other Model, Passing Spirits, Inhabitants of Wraithwood, Denker's Book, or Susie worth your while. Denker's Book is, handily, available freely online from Fearnet. Copping Squid is available from Dread Central; why arenâ€™t you reading it yet?
I cannot, in good conscience, recommend Engraving, The Correspondence of Cameron Thaddeus Nash, Violence Child of Trust, An Eldritch Matter or Rotterdam as Lovecraftian short stories per se, although all have their points of interest. This is not to say nobody else would enjoy them; a quick glance at some other reviews shows that they already have.
Stories and Authors
Pickman's Other Model - CaitlÃn R. Kiernan
Desert Dreams - Donald R. Burleson
Engravings - Joseph S. Pulver, Sr.
Copping Squid - Michael Shea
Passing Spirits - Sam Gafford
The Broadsword - Laird Barron
Usurped - William Browning Spencer
Denker's Book - David J. Schow
Inhabitants of Wraithwood - W. H. Pugmire
Rotterdam - Nicholas Royle
Tempting Providence - Jonathan Thomas
Howling in the Dark - Darrell Schweitzer
The Truth about Pickman - Brian Stableford
Tunnels - Philip Haldeman
The Correspondence of Cameron Thaddeus Nash - Annotated by Ramsey Campbell
Violence, Child of Trust - Michael Cisco
Lesser Demons - Norman Partridge
An Eldritch Matter - Adam Niswander
Substitution - Michael Marshall Smith
Susie - Jason Van Hollander